This includes the University of Nottingham, which controversially did not make it through in the first round.īut e-Qualitas, a large SCITT which was rated ‘inadequate’ for its primary and secondary provision in February, made the grade, as did ‘requires improvement’-rated providers Birmingham City University, Canterbury Christ Church University and the Mid Somerset Consortium. The university plans to challenge the outcome.Īll other Russell Group members, and the five other recently ‘outstanding’-rated institutions got through. Notably absent from the list is Russell Group member the University of Durham, and the North East Partnership SCITT, one of only six providers given a coveted ‘outstanding’ rating under Ofsted’s tough new inspection framework.ĭurham said it “remains committed to teacher education of the highest quality”, and was “disappointed at this outcome”. Top-rated SCITT and elite uni not on list However, the government said it was “considering how and when prospective providers could apply for accreditation after that date”. This comes despite woeful recruitment for trainee teachers next year. Ministers have also confirmed they don’t intend to run a third accreditation round before 2024, something they had kept up their sleeve. There were around 240 providers operating last year, meaning the review will result in a total reduction of about 25 per cent once new entrants are taken into account. These include 104 of 162 existing SCITTs, 59 of 69 higher education institutions and 17 new entrants to the market. The government today published a full list of 179 providers who gained re-accreditation. The success rate of those that did apply was 80 per cent. This represents about 36 per cent of the SCITTS operating in England before the review began. The National Association of School-Based Initial Teacher Trainers said 27 SCITTs failed to get through either of the two accreditation rounds held this year, while 31 did not put themselves forward. Teacher trainers responsible for more than 5,000 trainees face having to merge with others or close after being left without accreditation following a controversial government ITT review.Ī third of school-based initial teacher trainers (SCITTs) and one in seven universities that provided teacher training before the review either failed to gain accreditation or chose not to apply (see full list at bottom of story).
0 kommentar(er)
